Wow, I'm feelin that Mick's got some "latin passion" (say it with a spanish accent). JK. But I agree with Mick, and it would be fine with me for the game to be put on hold until August, as I've got a big crunch coming up. Besides, i need time to reevaluate Holland's master plan involving clogs, cheese, windmills, and dikes. So that's one for Mick.

Archer


On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Gerald Todd <sgttodd(at)mainecav.org ([email]sgttodd(at)mainecav.org[/email])> wrote:

This game was postponed 2 weeks in starting and if held again would be another 2 weeks. Is everyone willing to wait two+ weeks to resume this game? If so, then I'll set the deadline for Spring 42 at August 6th - and we'll play from there.

Jerry


Mickstagman(at)aol.com ([email]Mickstagman(at)aol.com[/email]) wrote:
[quote:fee5d3bf3b]I am not happy about having somone stand in for me for two moves, as my stratagies & relationships with other players will certainly be compromised; however it is not my decision to make!
If a standin is used, I think it only right that the standin player takes over GB through to the end of the game, (which is quite likely what the GM preffers?). But I would like it made clear that I am not resigning from the game, as once I commit myself to a game, I see it through to a conclusion. Other email diplomacy games that I am involved in have been put on hold, as like this one, I notified the GM in plenty of time that I would be unavailable through family commitments. It seems as though a precedence has now been set in this game.
Mick

[/quote:fee5d3bf3b]


--
-Archer