| 1648 091010: Corrected Adjucation in the pipeline - hmtucaz (Mar 29, 2010, 4:36 pm) |
Charles -
So glad you are correcting this. I guess it means that my moves gave me the solo win. No need to do the maps. Instead you can just announce my victory.
I'll accept everyone&#[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Corrected Adjucation in the pipeline - charlesf (Mar 29, 2010, 4:32 pm) |
Hi guys,
I'm afraid I missed a set of later orders and hence the adjucation I sent out earlier is invalid. Actually, I noticed my mistake as the message was being sent and stopped the message trans[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Corrected Adjucation in the pipeline (dc279) hmtucaz Mar 29, 04:36 pm |
Charles -
So glad you are correcting this. I guess it means that my moves gave me the solo win. No need to do the maps. Instead you can just announce my victory.
I'll accept everyone&# |
| 1648 091010: Fall 1655 Moves - MattKelly (Mar 29, 2010, 4:10 pm) |
I sent in a changed set of orders this a.m. did you not recieve them?
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Matthew Kelly <kelly058(at)verizon.net>
[b:777e1e10ef]To:[[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Fall 1655 Moves - charlesf (Mar 29, 2010, 4:04 pm) |
Hi guys,
if you thought the English would hold on to Novgorod, well, you were mistaken. The Poles retook the ancient city as Cromwell's men focused on securing territory in the East (in doing so, r[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Fall 1655 Moves (dc279) MattKelly Mar 29, 04:10 pm |
I sent in a changed set of orders this a.m. did you not recieve them?
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Matthew Kelly <kelly058(at)verizon.net>
[b:777e1e10ef]To:[ |
| 1648 v3.3 - charlesf (Mar 27, 2010, 8:37 am) |
Hi guys,
just a brief variant design heads-up: I've now finished implementing a couple of further changes to the variant. Eastern Europe has undergone considerable change since my reworking of othe[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Polish monarch returns from exile - charlesf (Mar 25, 2010, 11:03 am) |
Hi guys,
Jorge has retracted his resignation and since that step was never of my own choosing, I've welcomed him back with immediate effect.
As such, we shall proceed on to the Fall 1655 Moves t[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Summer 1655 Retreats - offdisc (Mar 24, 2010, 6:30 pm) |
[quote:d3088f81b5]I asked this question in a previous email and have not received an answer:
If Abo has no coasts, then it cannot force a break in Ing's coasts either
(ala Swe / Den in Standard). I[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Summer 1655 Retreats - charlesf (Mar 24, 2010, 5:57 pm) |
Mike,
I recognise and wrote that Abo's character ought to be further explained in the variant rules. I rely on playtesters to point out what points need to be further specified/clarified. As a desi[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Summer 1655 Retreats - offdisc (Mar 24, 2010, 5:17 pm) |
Charles,
As I mentioned in my previous email, I use the DC Variants page for descriptions. It includes a very detailed point about Ingria, never mentioning Denmark or Standard Dip:
"Ingria is[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Summer 1655 Retreats - charlesf (Mar 24, 2010, 4:42 pm) |
Hi guys,
from what I gather, Jorge has communicated to you players separately his resigning from the game. He cited in his correspondence with me his dissatisfaction over Abo/Lake Ladoga.
Now, t[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Summer 1655 Retreats (dc279) offdisc Mar 24, 05:17 pm |
Charles,
As I mentioned in my previous email, I use the DC Variants page for descriptions. It includes a very detailed point about Ingria, never mentioning Denmark or Standard Dip:
"Ingria is |
| 1648 091010: Summer 1655 Retreats (dc279) charlesf Mar 24, 05:57 pm |
Mike,
I recognise and wrote that Abo's character ought to be further explained in the variant rules. I rely on playtesters to point out what points need to be further specified/clarified. As a desi |
| 1648 091010: Summer 1655 Retreats (dc279) offdisc Mar 24, 06:30 pm |
[quote:d3088f81b5]I asked this question in a previous email and have not received an answer:
If Abo has no coasts, then it cannot force a break in Ing's coasts either
(ala Swe / Den in Standard). I |
| 1648 091010: Spring 1655 Moves - charlesf (Mar 23, 2010, 6:38 pm) |
Hallo zusammen,
I'm afraid two issues prevented me from publishing results yesterday. Mike's only got back from his holiday after the deadline had run its course and he hadn't sent me a set of orde[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Update - charlesf (Mar 11, 2010, 5:08 pm) |
The overall trend with these changes and the ones you already made in the Med are to limit stalemates.
Well, I'd say the East-West confrontation we've seen in t[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Update - txurce (Mar 11, 2010, 12:59 pm) |
Slow attacks are what it's all about! Which is why I'm advocating for splitting up the English Arctic passage!
Cheers,
Jorge
2010/3/11 Charles Féaux de la Croix <charlesf(at)web.de ([Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Update - charlesf (Mar 11, 2010, 12:57 pm) |
Ah, if you guys think the extra buffer has merit, I guess I'll draw a map for you to comment upon. Would move Poland and Russia further apart.
As for redrawing Moscow to touch NRG and add that buff[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Update - txurce (Mar 11, 2010, 9:58 am) |
Charles,
I like the idea of giving Austria more incentive to move east instead of west. Another buffer on the Russo-Polish border is a good idea both ways, taking pressure off both and allowing b[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Update - charlesf (Mar 11, 2010, 9:50 am) |
Nigs,
well, I'm not sure this change makes Swabia less of a bottleneck (which don't have a particular issue with). Had I chosen to have Franconia border Hesse, then yes. But I didn't want to make t[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Update - txurce (Mar 10, 2010, 9:36 pm) |
[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Update - Nigs (Mar 10, 2010, 3:47 pm) |
Charles,
I like the effect of Franconia and the prussian changes. Franconia in particular should help to avoid blockades in middle germany. I don't know turkey's territories well enough to comment[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Update - charlesf (Mar 10, 2010, 2:36 pm) |
Hi guys,
of course I got my dates mixed up. The 22nd is a Monday, so we'll stick to Mondays for now.
Been working on the map lately and decided to imploment another three changes (though I have[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Update (dc279) Nigs Mar 10, 03:47 pm |
Charles,
I like the effect of Franconia and the prussian changes. Franconia in particular should help to avoid blockades in middle germany. I don't know turkey's territories well enough to comment |
| 1648 091010: Update (dc279) txurce Mar 10, 09:36 pm |
|
| 1648 091010: Update (dc279) charlesf Mar 11, 09:50 am |
Nigs,
well, I'm not sure this change makes Swabia less of a bottleneck (which don't have a particular issue with). Had I chosen to have Franconia border Hesse, then yes. But I didn't want to make t |
| 1648 091010: Update (dc279) txurce Mar 11, 09:58 am |
Charles,
I like the idea of giving Austria more incentive to move east instead of west. Another buffer on the Russo-Polish border is a good idea both ways, taking pressure off both and allowing b |
| 1648 091010: Update (dc279) charlesf Mar 11, 12:57 pm |
Ah, if you guys think the extra buffer has merit, I guess I'll draw a map for you to comment upon. Would move Poland and Russia further apart.
As for redrawing Moscow to touch NRG and add that buff |
| 1648 091010: Update (dc279) txurce Mar 11, 12:59 pm |
Slow attacks are what it's all about! Which is why I'm advocating for splitting up the English Arctic passage!
Cheers,
Jorge
2010/3/11 Charles Féaux de la Croix <charlesf(at)web.de ( |
| 1648 091010: Update (dc279) charlesf Mar 11, 05:08 pm |
The overall trend with these changes and the ones you already made in the Med are to limit stalemates.
Well, I'd say the East-West confrontation we've seen in t |
| 1648 091010: Winter 1654 Retreats/Adjustments - charlesf (Mar 09, 2010, 12:32 pm) |
Hallo zusammen,
now that three of the four pillars of the Swedish realm have been knocked down (i.e. Finland, Livonia and Sweden proper), only the German pillar remains. Confined to North-Eastern G[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Fall 1654 Moves - charlesf (Mar 08, 2010, 2:55 pm) |
Hallo zusammen,
as you know, I'm keeping track of the number of times Swabia flips. Well, here's our sixth flip! Not bad for the few years we've been playing, particularly considering the by design[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Summer 1654 Retreats - charlesf (Mar 03, 2010, 9:59 am) |
Hallöle,
other than perhaps the Polish retreat, this summer season has been quite straightforward. Will this Polish outpost have to surrender come fall or manage to escape that fate? Stay tuned.[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Spring 1654 Moves - charlesf (Mar 01, 2010, 5:19 pm) |
Hi guys,
life in Swabia's peasants must be living hell. To date this strategically important province of the Holy Roman Empire has witnessed five invasions ever since Europe's monarchs once again e[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Spring 1654 Moves - charlesf (Mar 01, 2010, 5:18 pm) |
Hi guys,
life in Swabia's peasants must be living hell. To date this strategically important province of the Holy Roman Empire has witnessed five invasions ever since Europe's monarchs once again e[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Spring 1654 Moves (dc279) charlesf Mar 01, 05:19 pm |
Hi guys,
life in Swabia's peasants must be living hell. To date this strategically important province of the Holy Roman Empire has witnessed five invasions ever since Europe's monarchs once again e |
| 1648 091010: Winter 1653 Retreats/Adjustments - charlesf (Feb 25, 2010, 6:54 pm) |
You count a little, Ben. 
BTW, what dya make of the v3.1 changes I've been working on?
[quote:8f9315c654] ----- Original Message -----
From: dc279 ([email]dc279(at)d[Reply] |
