Welcome Guest!  [Log In]  [Sign Up]

Diplomaticcorp Discussion Forum:  dc279

(2nd 1648 Playtest)


Post:< 14603 
Subject:< 1648: Variant Changes >
Topic:< dc279 >
Category:< Active Games >
Author:charlesf
Posted:Feb 22, 2010 at 8:18 pm
Viewed:811 times

  [New Post]  [Reply]  [Quote]

Jorge,

the Med may become a real drain on Spanish and Turkish resources, simply because there's more ground to cover. This is supposed to counteract their positional advantage of being corner powers.

The opportunities for a decisive campaign are greater, which in turn may compell other powers to engage in the Med when they might have not under previous variant versions.

That being said, Turkey and Spain are now actually farther apart. So perhaps that might help some find a peaceful settlement in the Med.

The Gulf of Sidra is the least certain change. But I like having a real southern axis of advance. Gives especially Turkey more potential leverage over Tunis, which is part of the wider rebalancing scheme.

More fluidity and drama. That's what I'm gunning for.

Cheers,

Charles

Hi Charles,


One of the maps you sent me didn't have SOS and GOS, so now I can see everything you described. All of the changes work for me in accomplishing what you seek. It creates more fluidity in NW Europe, gives France a better shot at the HRE, cuts the one overpowered nation (Spain) down to size, and creates a more interesting Med situation. Given that the Med will still probably be a Turco-Spanish affair, I don't know that you need the extra centers for more maneuverability, and you may not need GOS. Finally, while these changes will all contribute to more fluidity, and therefore more stabs, it's still a good idea to see what happens if you reduce the winning number to 15.


Jorge

This message is in reply to post 14599:

Hi guys,

lately I've been considering a number of changes to the variant. Since I thought you might be interested in what I'm planning for 1648 and appreciate any feedback, here's a brief overview of the various changes I have in mind:

1) MERE 15 SCs REQUIRED FOR A SOLO VICTORY:

In other words, you need only 26% rather than 31% of all SCs to become the continent's hegemon. This is supposed to both make solos easier to achieve and tempt players to stab more often.

2) ADDITION OF LUXEMBOURG BUFFER SPACE:

Not only does this afford all player more room for manoeuvre, but it grants France better access to the Empire and removes the intitial leverage the Spanish Army of Flanders enjoys over Lorraine, to date the primary gateway for France towards the East.

3) VENICE & TUSCANY NO LONGER ADJACENT:

Lombardy's importance is enhanced now that it also borders the Papal States. This somewhat lessens Franco-Austrian friction as spheres of interest in Italy are more easily separated. There's now also a symmetry regarding the number of minor powers may lend support Austrian and French attempts in taking their respective Italian "natural SCs". Which means also that Austria can more easily kept out of Italy than under the present rules.

Much as the addition of Luxembourg, this change is in part explained by my desire to help France.

4) ADDITION OF STRAIT OF SICILY & GULF OF SIDRA SEA SPACES:

This equally provides greater room for manoeuvre. The Tyrrhenian was too much of a bottleneck, for my tastes. Sardinia and Sicily both gain greater relevance. Spain's Naples becomes more of an outpost considering the now greater distance to Sevilla. And Tunis is further removed from Spain's power base. Indeed, I think the power balance in the Med considerably shifts towards Turkey. So Spain has quite a bit more on its plate, which in turn affects France's fortunes. I'd argue Spain now feels really thinly spread, much as it was historically.

Now, the Ionian remains as central in Spanish-Turkish affairs. But there's now also a Southern line of advance across the Mediterranean.

Anyway, what do you think of these changes shown on the below map? And if you have any ideas of your own as what to change, I'd be interested in those too. Smile

Cheers,

Charles

There are 3 Messages in this Thread:


1648: Variant Changes (charlesf) Feb 22, 07:36 pm

1648: Variant Changes (txurce) Feb 22, 07:55 pm

1648: Variant Changes (charlesf) Feb 22, 08:18 pm

Diplomacy games may contain lying, stabbing, or deliberately deceiving communications that may not be suitable for and may pose a hazard to young children, gullible adults, and small farm animals.

Powered by Fuzzy Logic · You are visitor number 55609 · Page loaded in 0.2835 seconds by DESMOND