| 1648 091010: Winter 1653 Retreats/Adjustments - Kenshi777 (Feb 25, 2010, 10:52 am) |
I use the RP files - but as I'm not a player, perhaps I don't count 
B.
On 2/25/10, Charles Féaux de la Croix <charlesf(at)web.de> wrote:
[quote:f416ea77fa]
Hi guys,
the Army of Flan[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Winter 1653 Retreats/Adjustments - charlesf (Feb 25, 2010, 7:32 am) |
Hi guys,
the Army of Flanders' long trek across Germany has brought it to the Baltic shore. Since however Sweden couldn't use its spare builds anyway (as Stettin and Riga are both blocked), this re[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Winter 1653 Retreats/Adjustments (dc279) Kenshi777 Feb 25, 10:52 am |
I use the RP files - but as I'm not a player, perhaps I don't count
B.
On 2/25/10, Charles Féaux de la Croix <charlesf(at)web.de> wrote:
[quote:f416ea77fa]
Hi guys,
the Army of Flan |
| 1648 091010: Winter 1653 Retreats/Adjustments (dc279) charlesf Feb 25, 06:54 pm |
You count a little, Ben. 
BTW, what dya make of the v3.1 changes I've been working on?
[quote:8f9315c654] ----- Original Message -----
From: dc279 ([email]dc279(at)d |
| 1648: Variant Changes - charlesf (Feb 22, 2010, 8:18 pm) |
Jorge,
the Med may become a real drain on Spanish and Turkish resources, simply because there's more ground to cover. This is supposed to counteract their positional advantage of being corner power[Reply] |
| 1648: Variant Changes - txurce (Feb 22, 2010, 7:55 pm) |
Hi Charles,
One of the maps you sent me didn't have SOS and GOS, so now I can see everything you described. All of the changes work for me in accomplishing what you seek. It creates more fl[Reply] |
| 1648: Variant Changes - charlesf (Feb 22, 2010, 7:36 pm) |
Hi guys,
lately I've been considering a number of changes to the variant. Since I thought you might be interested in what I'm planning for 1648 and appreciate any feedback, here's a brief overview[Reply] |
| 1648: Variant Changes (dc279) txurce Feb 22, 07:55 pm |
Hi Charles,
One of the maps you sent me didn't have SOS and GOS, so now I can see everything you described. All of the changes work for me in accomplishing what you seek. It creates more fl |
| 1648: Variant Changes (dc279) charlesf Feb 22, 08:18 pm |
Jorge,
the Med may become a real drain on Spanish and Turkish resources, simply because there's more ground to cover. This is supposed to counteract their positional advantage of being corner power |
| 1648 091010: Fall 1653 Moves - charlesf (Feb 22, 2010, 1:12 pm) |
Hi guys,
the broad front that stretches from Scandinavia down to the Central Mediterranean has been subjected to a fair number of alterations. For starters, Polish lancers have charged across the N[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Spring 1653 Moves - charlesf (Feb 15, 2010, 7:02 pm) |
Hi guys,
time to say goodbye to Marc. After a long struggle, the exiled Danish monarch has succumbed to Swedish numerical superiority. Marc, thanks for playing and soldiering on until the final cur[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Winter 1652 Retreats/Adjustments - charlesf (Feb 09, 2010, 1:21 pm) |
Hi guys,
battle-hardened mercenaries currently appear to be more in demand than sailors. Are Europe's statesmen anticipating a decision on land rather than at high sea?
As previously detailed, I[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: The Swedish Cavalry has arrived! - charlesf (Feb 07, 2010, 1:05 pm) |
Hi guys,
I trust you share my relief that after the recent turmoil, Matt Kelly, a player who hasn't NMRed once in 13 games, has kindly stepped forward and taken over the Swedish realm.
In the in[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - hmtucaz (Feb 06, 2010, 1:36 pm) |
Charles -
I echo Dirk's comments.
Harvey
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Dirk Knemeyer <dirk(at)knemeyer.com ([email]dirk(at)knemeyer.com[/email])> wrote:
[quote:6b56227f70]
Charles[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - charlesf (Feb 06, 2010, 1:33 pm) |
Jorge's memory serves me better than mine. Nick was involved in a truly massive number of games and simply couldn't keep up.
[quote:0ef5369a5b] With regard to Nick, the original Austrian leader, my u[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - dknemeyer (Feb 06, 2010, 1:31 pm) |
Charles,
Speaking only for myself, the frustration is a product of your not being forthcoming with the reasons-why there are delays. While on one hand it is thoughtful to protect a struggling play[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - txurce (Feb 06, 2010, 1:03 pm) |
| With regard to Nick, the original Austrian leader, my understanding is that Charles did not ask him to leave. There's little doubt that a player not talking in a game based on talking whose posi [Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - charlesf (Feb 06, 2010, 12:54 pm) |
FWIW, I was annoyed at the manner of austria's departure, and discussed with Dirk and Harvey my concern sat that stage, and was persuaded to carry on.
Nigs, you[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - charlesf (Feb 06, 2010, 12:46 pm) |
Guys,
as it so happens, our replacement failed to submit orders. Despite my repeated warnings to him.
Such is the risk of taking on a newbie to the site.
Since I wanted to give him a chance t[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - Nigs (Feb 06, 2010, 12:38 pm) |
| FWIW, I was annoyed at the manner of austria's departure, and discussed with Dirk and Harvey my concern sat that stage, and was persuaded to carry on. From what I remember it seemed to me that Charles [Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - hmtucaz (Feb 06, 2010, 11:09 am) |
Everyone -
OK. I, too, vote for DIAS.
Time to move on.
Harvey
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Dirk Knemeyer <dirk(at)knemeyer.com ([email]dirk(at)knemeyer.com[/email])> wrote:
[quote:e[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - dknemeyer (Feb 06, 2010, 11:00 am) |
Hi Harvey,
For me, I try hard and take pride in always getting my turns in and completing my games. "Abandoning" a game is not something I would be happy with, personally. I would be fin[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - txurce (Feb 06, 2010, 10:59 am) |
| I agree with Mike's assessment. There's no need for us to resign - why spoil so many unblemished track records? It is within our rights as players to call for a DIAS. This vote seems to [Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - offdisc (Feb 06, 2010, 10:53 am) |
Harvey,
I've never resigned from a game in my life. I've also never abandoned
a game, although I've missed a deadline or two.
I will vote for a DIAS, but I will not participate in a "ma[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - offdisc (Feb 06, 2010, 10:50 am) |
I told Charles 2 weeks ago that I wouldn't mind calling the game, but
I'd also be willing to stick with it. Whatever the "majority" voted
for.
Considering these last messages, it's cle[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - hmtucaz (Feb 06, 2010, 10:48 am) |
Everyone -
My two cents.
I have never resigned from a game, and have never gone absent.
As some of you know, a week or two ago I wrote Charles to say that I was on the verge of resigning from[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - txurce (Feb 06, 2010, 10:21 am) |
I would officially vote Yes for a DIAS, even though it deprives Nigs of his shot at the crown of the HRE. Sometimes we have to make sacrifices for the greater good.
Jorge
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 a[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - ellingermc (Feb 06, 2010, 10:20 am) |
Ok by me.
Marc H. Ellinger, CPA
Attorney at Law
Blitz, Bardgett & Deutsch, LC
308 East High Street, Suite 301
Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
(573) 634-2500
(573) 634-3358 (Facsim[Reply] |
| 1648 091010: Upcoming Adjucation - dknemeyer (Feb 06, 2010, 10:15 am) |
| I agree with the general sentiment. It appears Charles is struggling with time a little bit. I formally propose and vote yes for a DIAS. This way he can be free of the adjudication responsibility and [Reply] |
