Doesn't Australia have the option of retreating the army from per (in which case there would be no build)? Or did he already indicate that he would disband?
From: Hugh Polley <hapolley(at)yahoo.ca>
To: John Barringer <jonnyb2k(at)yahoo.com>; email website DC437 <dc437(at)diplomaticcorp.com>; Warren Fleming <alwayshunted(at)hotmail.com>; Michael Sims <mike(at)fuzzylogicllc.net>; Bret Polack <bret_pollack(at)hotmail.com>; Steve Caponigri <stevencaponigri(at)gmail.com>; Mark Smith <sandiegosmith(at)hotmail.com>; "jason4747(at)hotmail.com" <jason4747(at)hotmail.com>; "briankingfox(at)gmail.com" <briankingfox(at)gmail.com>
Sent:
Wednesday, January 30, 2013 5:55 PM
Subject: Oceania DC437\Fall/2004 Results! Winter Due ASAP!
[OCEANIA_DC437 Winter 2004 Due; Get them in today if possible!]
[YES there is a Century change from 1900 to 2000]
I did this because Diplomaticcorp.com used 2000 for game start.
Indonesia, Japan, heading Australia's way?
Japan takes Wak!
New Zealand and France sphere of influence colliding
and France loses a unit!
Japan continues to control large tracks of the Pacific but
does not get a build.
======================================================================
OCEANIA DC437\FALL/2004 RESULTS
RETREATS:
Aust A per TO ade,OTB
BUILDS AND REMOVALS IF RETREATS DISBANDED:
Aust Build 1 Unit
Fran Remove 1 Unit
Indo Build 1 Unit
Mars Build 1 Unit
With Warm Regards!
Hugh - hapolley(at)yahoo.ca