*Our* wacky time zomes!? Why, it's still yesterday for you! Australia:
Moving Forwards. (its a politics reference, James will get it)
On 28/10/2011, Gerry Bayer wrote:
I blame the Australians and their wacky time zones !

Good thing it's a long way from Australia to Canada...

Gerry

On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Matt O'Donnell wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> I do take responsibility for not noticing or notifying Eric about the
> error
> sooner. I lost computer access over the weekend & and so didn't have an
> opportunity to look over the results and talk to him about it.
>
> I do apologize for the inconvenience
>
> Matt
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Michael Sims
> *To:* Gerry Bayer ; Gareth Griffiths gnr.griffiths(at)gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Eric Palmer ; bret_pollack(at)hotmail.com;
> flexpoint1(at)gmail.com; gizmo8204(at)yahoo.com; jsfyfield(at)gmail.com;
> james_32(at)bigpond.com; dc397 ; Garry Bledsoe kielmarch(at)hotmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 27, 2011 12:44 PM
> *Subject:* RE: DC397 - Corrected Fall 1901 Results - Redo for
> Winter/Spring 1902
>
> Hey guys,
>
> Interesting there. I believe that is a typo in the rules that needs
> fixing. "major turn" in any sense I've ever considered it - is spring and
> fall. "minor turns" are summer retreats, autumn retreats, and winter
> adjustments. Even the game manual defines them this way, those being just
> phases of the major turn - to the extent your'e not even supposed to
> diplome
> on the winter phase, you're just supposed to submit your builds. The
> intent
> there, albeit indicated wrongly, is that if a major turn passes, one
> wouldn't back up a spring or fall turn since these generally reveal the
> results of substantial negotiations.
>
> As always, in the house rules is that the GM always has final say, so
> whatever Eric decides is fine w me.
>
> I'll discuss w Garry but we'll probly tweak the rule later as a result of
> that being pointed out...
>
> Your friendly mod,
> -mike
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Gerry Bayer [mailto:starhop8(at)gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thu 10/27/2011 11:36 AM
> *To:* Gareth Griffiths
> *Cc:* Eric Palmer; bret_pollack(at)hotmail.com; flexpoint1(at)gmail.com;
> gizmo8204(at)yahoo.com; jsfyfield(at)gmail.com; james_32(at)bigpond.com; dc397;
> Michael Sims
> *Subject:* Re: DC397 - Corrected Fall 1901 Results - Redo for
> Winter/Spring 1902
>
> I also agree with replaying in this situation . Gareth does make a good
> point regarding the rule so that we're clear on what happens should this
> occur again .
>
> Gerry
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Gareth Griffiths gnr.griffiths(at)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> **
> Hi all,
>
> *I've not got a problem with re-doing winter and spring* as I think it
> will make the game more interesting.
>
> However, since we're meant to be following the DC house rule, the error
> should have stood:
>
> *'Any errors in adjudications must be brought to the attention of the GM
> before the next major deadline (Spring, Fall, Winter) else that error will
> stand.'*
>
> I'm only bringing this up *in case* there's an error in future as I think
> we should follow the rule correctly from now on and everyone should be
> aware
> of it.
>
> Gareth (Germany)
>
>
> On 27/10/2011 03:11, Eric Palmer wrote:
>
> I've made a huge mistake.
>
> *I entered wrong orders for Fall 1901.*
>
> Here's what's going to happen:
>
> I will not reveal or adjudicate the orders I just received for Spring 1902
> and we will replay Winter 1901 and Spring 1902.
>
> So we'll start with builds (Winter 1901).
>
> You have 48 hours to confirm the builds you've submitted or resubmit build
> orders (or submit build orders for the first time in the cases of Austria
> and Italy). If I don't receive a confirmation in the next 48 hours (by 28
> OCT 2 AM GMT), I will leave your builds as previously submitted. If I
> receive confirmations or changes prior to this deadline, I may send out an
> announcement of the builds earlier. From then, you'll have four days
> (unless
> anyone requires an extension) to submit new Spring 1902 orders. (I'll send
> notice of the deadline with the build results).
>
> I sincerely regret and apologize for the confusion and the waste of time
> and energy this mistake and the redo may cause, but I believe it is
> clearly
> unfair for *two *players to be short units they should have been awarded,
> especially at this early point in the game.
>
> While I do not anticipate any further GM mistakes during the game, please
> bring ANY issues with results to my attention as early as possible.
>
> - Eric Palmer (your erstwhile GM)
>
> *Here are the corrected results for Fall 1901.*
>
> Austria:
> F Albania - Greece
> A Serbia Supports F Albania - Greece
> A Vienna - Trieste (*Bounce*)
>
> England:
> A Edinburgh - Norway
> F London - English Channel
> F North Sea Convoys A Edinburgh - Norway
>
> France:
> F Brest - Mid-Atlantic Ocean
> A Gascony - Spain
> A Spain - Portugal
>
> Germany:
> F Denmark Hold
> A Kiel - Holland
> A Ruhr - Belgium
>
> *Italy: *
> *A Apulia - Tunis*
> *F Ionian Sea Convoys A Apulia - Tunis*
> *A Venice - Trieste (*Bounce*)*
>
> Russia:
> A Galicia - Budapest
> F Gulf of Bothnia - Sweden
> F Sevastopol Supports A Ukraine - Rumania
> A Ukraine - Rumania
>
> Turkey:
> F Ankara Hold
> A Bulgaria Supports A Apulia - Greece (*Void*)
> A Constantinople - Smyrna
>
> BUILDS:
> *Austria 1*
> England 1
> France 2
> Germany 3
> *Italy 1*
> Russia 3
> Turkey 1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
Joseph F.