I will not officially declare any end of Game until thursday morning. Remember that someone could agree to an EGP publically but counter that privately. It's always encouraged to continue to submit moves just in case. Also, along those lines, if any of the EGP *do* pass, they happen before the turn is adjudicated, and so I will not list any moves, nor will centers change hands. Just fyi. Thanks all!
John
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 19:25:26 -0700
Subject: Re: DC 424 Spring 06
From: amtrating(at)gmail.com
To: davidknight1955(at)gmail.com
CC: rick_powell_2000(at)yahoo.com; jerome777(at)ymail.com; untitled36(at)hotmail.com; bret_pollack(at)hotmail.com; dip.power.915(at)gmail.com; rich3520(at)aol.com; blitz(at)diplomaticcorp.com
So, we're only missing Turkey's public affirmation, am I right?
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:28 PM, david knight <davidknight1955(at)gmail.com> wrote:
Rick is a true sportsman. It has been a pleasure to play with him.
Best wishes
David
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:03 PM, rick powell <rick_powell_2000(at)yahoo.com> wrote:
I am happy with all 3 EGP's
From: Jerome Payne <jerome777(at)ymail.com>
To: John R <untitled36(at)hotmail.com>; Andrew Tanner <amtrating(at)gmail.com>
Cc: bret_pollack(at)hotmail.com; davidknight1955(at)gmail.com; dip.power.915(at)gmail.com; wb 2 russia
<rich3520(at)aol.com>; England WB 2012 <rick_powell_2000(at)yahoo.com>; blitz(at)diplomaticcorp.com
Sent: Monday, 14 May 2012, 16:27
Subject: Re: DC 424 Spring 06
Yes to all EGPs.
This game is rapidly descending into rancour and farce. Let's just DIAS it, it's the humane way to go.
Jerome
--- On
Mon, 14/5/12, Andrew Tanner <amtrating(at)gmail.com> wrote:
From: Andrew Tanner <amtrating(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: DC 424 Spring 06
To: "John R" <untitled36(at)hotmail.com>
Cc: bret_pollack(at)hotmail.com, davidknight1955(at)gmail.com, dip.power.915(at)gmail.com, "WB 2011 england 1" <jerome777(at)ymail.com>, "wb 2 russia" <rich3520(at)aol.com>, "England WB 2012" <rick_powell_2000(at)yahoo.com>, blitz(at)diplomaticcorp.com
Date: Monday, 14 May, 2012, 15:15
Yes to all EGPs.
England has been trying to play games with everyone, so I say if he won't accept a draw that leaves out anyone with less than 5 centers, you all reduce him to zero
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 7:38 AM, John R <untitled36(at)hotmail.com> wrote:
An IGR was just proposed. So that means there are three votes needed. The DIAS, the IGR, and the Russian solo.
John
From: untitled36(at)hotmail.com
To: amtrating(at)gmail.com; bret_pollack(at)hotmail.com; davidknight1955(at)gmail.com; dip.power.915(at)gmail.com; jerome777(at)ymail.com; rich3520(at)aol.com; rick_powell_2000(at)yahoo.com; blitz(at)diplomaticcorp.com
Subject: RE: DC 424 Spring 06
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 09:36:08 -0500
Argh. with all the EGP talk I forgot the basic retreat. Vienna can retreat to Boh or Gal. That's due tomorrow.
John
From: untitled36(at)hotmail.com
To: amtrating(at)gmail.com; bret_pollack(at)hotmail.com; davidknight1955(at)gmail.com; dip.power.915(at)gmail.com; jerome777(at)ymail.com; rich3520(at)aol.com; rick_powell_2000(at)yahoo.com; blitz(at)diplomaticcorp.com
Subject: DC 424 Spring 06
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 09:32:37 -0500
*Austria Didn't Get the Memo*
*Cool Heads Talk Peace*
*Italians Swap Tri for Vie*
Hey all,
First off, sorry for being out of communication this weekend. I know an end game proposal was suggested, but I was away from my computer and unable to officially put that out. Also, lots of revisions this turn, so make sure I got your most recent set of moves. I was most concerned about Austria's set, but I double checked it and it appears to be correct.
End game proposal-wise. Here's how I deal with that. I will generally ask for a vote on any end game proposal suggested (whether it is proposed in public or privately to me). If someone replies to all with a vote, I will consider it their vote unless they privately message me saying they actually want to vote differently. I will not say who proposed what vote, or who voted what. Results will be pass or fail. Even after the game is over I will not list
who voted
for what, although obviously if a proposal passes, that means everyone voted yes. Also, if there are two end game proposals and both pass, the MORE inclusive proposal succeeds. Lastly, you CAN propose a draw and then vote against it. I had a GM once who would not allow that, but I'm fine with it.
For this season we have two EGP's, on both extremes. There's a Russian Solo and a DIAS on the table. Votes are due with fall moves. Again, votes must be unanimous to pass, and a failure to vote counts as a "no" vote.
Whew. Hope that covers everything. Any questions, feel free to ask.
John
Austria:
A Albania Supports A Trieste (*Ordered to Move*)
A Tunis - North Africa
England:
F Denmark Supports F Edinburgh - North Sea
F Edinburgh - North Sea
F London - English Channel
F Wales Supports F London - English Channel
Germany:
F Belgium - Holland
A Brest -
Paris
A Burgundy -
Ruhr
F Helgoland Bight Supports F Denmark
A Kiel Supports A Munich - Berlin
A Munich - Berlin (*Fails*)
Italy:
F Aegean Sea - Greece
F Eastern Mediterranean - Aegean Sea
F Gascony - Brest
F Ionian Sea Convoys A Tunis - Apulia (*Void*)
F Mid-Atlantic Ocean - North Atlantic Ocean
A Trieste - Vienna
A Tyrolia Supports A Trieste - Vienna
Russia:
F Baltic Sea Supports A Berlin
A Berlin Supports A Warsaw - Silesia (*Cut*)
A Budapest Supports A Serbia - Trieste
F Bulgaria(ec) - Black Sea
A Norway Supports A Sweden
F Norwegian Sea Supports F Edinburgh - North Sea
A Rumania - Serbia
A Sevastopol - Rumania
A Sweden Supports F Denmark
A Vienna Supports A Serbia - Trieste (*Dislodged*)
A Warsaw - Silesia
Turkey:
A Ankara Supports F Syria - Smyrna
F Constantinople Supports F Syria - Smyrna
A Serbia - Trieste
F Syria -
Smyrna
