Welcome Guest!  [Log In]  [Sign Up]

Diplomaticcorp Discussion Forum:  Community

(community(at)diplomaticcorp(dot)com)


Post:< 26871 >
Subject:< A Call to Arms! >
Topic:Community >
Category:General >
Author:Operations
Posted:Jul 05, 2014 at 4:47 pm
Viewed:1170 times

  [New Post]  [Reply]  [Quote]

I personally start every game with the intention to solo. I never set out to split with anyone, and consider it a grudging last resort. I guess I can understand the thought process of some that a steady gain of mid-range points is better for their ranking than a reach for a solo that could end in a knock-out, but that policy is not for me.

This message is in reply to post 26855:

If everyone were to adopt a drawist outlook, games would be horribly boring. Carebearism.

Ambition spices things up. Makes for more lively dynamics. Diplomatic constellations shifting and changing constantly. Drawism leads to static alliances. That's why one actually owes it to one's fellow-players to show morale, ambition!

A good player will give his best. And giving his best means maximising his chances of winning. Chances are, he'll experience a thrilling game. He's willing to take risks. He'll prove a fighter. He won't pick the easy way. The path of least resistance.

Someone who has strong drawist inclinations is unlikely to take on tough challenges. He'll choose the path of least resistance.

That's why the sometimes voiced sentiment of "I'm working towards a draw, but will go for the solo if the opportunity arises" has got it all backwards. If you're working towards a draw, you'll be in league with several other big guys. You'll join them in taking out the weak guys. But that is precisely the course that works against one's chances of soloing! Someone who aims for the solo has an active interest in keeping the board weak, fractured and divided. Often the (relative) minnows are his greatest asset. Be it as grateful allies or as soft targets for the last few SCs.

The one who doesn't strive for the solo in a purposeful fashion, defeats himself on day one. He may pride himself for having got lots of SCs by the end of the game. But it's empty pride. For he has never given the game his all. He's chosen the least path of resistance. Quite frankly, I'd rate such a performance below someone's who strove for a solo from day one, made hard decisions, took risks that - ultimately - got him eliminated.

The drawist grown fat on SCs defeated himself. He never gave his all. Promoted circumstances detrimental to his soloing chances.

As far as I'm concerned, not the one's who got eliminated (or just survived) in a game ending in a draw did worst. No, it's the ones who have many SCs to their name. They're the ones most defeated by a draw. For they're closest to the prize. And it was denied to them.

And if they never meant to go strongly for that prize? Well, they're doubly defeated. By the others, but especially by themselves. I'd rate that as a quite shameful performance. Whatever the tactical acumen shown along the way. The grand strategy being self-defeating and the height of timidity!

You owe it to yourself and your fellow-players to seek to win. This really shouldn't be so hard or controversial.

I challenge you: Can anyone deny this?

There are 19 Messages in this Thread:


A Call to Arms! (charlesf) Jul 03, 08:37 am

A Call to Arms! (Operations) Jul 05, 04:47 pm

A Call to Arms! (vegas_iwish) Jul 05, 09:28 pm

A Call to Arms! (FuzzyLogic) Jul 08, 08:32 am

A Call to Arms! (charlesf) Jul 09, 07:39 am

A Call to Arms! (Operations) Jul 09, 12:05 pm

A Call to Arms! (vegas_iwish) Jul 12, 07:02 pm

A Call to Arms! (Sean2010) Jul 08, 03:10 pm

A Call to Arms! (Corrino) Jul 21, 01:53 pm

A Call to Arms! (Sean2010) Jul 22, 06:08 pm

A Call to Arms! (Corrino) Jul 23, 01:03 pm

A Call to Arms! (Sean2010) Jul 23, 11:02 pm

A Call to Arms! (charlesf) Jul 22, 06:52 pm

A Call to Arms! (Corrino) Jul 23, 01:14 pm

A Call to Arms! (FuzzyLogic) Jul 24, 09:03 am

A Call to Arms! (Corrino) Jul 28, 01:21 pm

A Call to Arms! (Sean2010) Jul 29, 12:00 am

A Call to Arms! (charlesf) Jul 29, 04:32 am

A Call to Arms! (Sean2010) Jul 29, 11:48 am

There are 181 Threads in Community:


Back after a while and hoping to play. (diplocowboy) [2 Replies]

Back after a while and hoping to play. (diplocowboy)

DC Games (DealingFungus66)

Cousins game (Sean2010) [3 Replies]

Cousins game (Sean2010)

Looking for one more player (Slangers)

Just Joined (Spindoctor6)

is DC dead ? (ruler462)

Brother's War (Conquest) (Sean2010)

Getting Started (DealingFungus66)

Sign Ups not working (umbletheheep)

2021 Winter Blitz? (umbletheheep)

PERFIDIOUS#2 (THC)

A Dip Read (THC)

Time for Games? (garry.bledsoe)

Spaces for Standard players (Slangers)

Offering a new way to play Diplomacy (Slangers)

New Member (Skeleton) [2 Replies]

First Intimate Game Ends! (Slangers)

Weekly Diplomacy Newsletter (umbletheheep)


1 - 20 of 181 shown [More]

Diplomacy games may contain lying, stabbing, or deliberately deceiving communications that may not be suitable for and may pose a hazard to young children, gullible adults, and small farm animals.

Powered by Fuzzy Logic · You are visitor number 55604 · Page loaded in 0.7328 seconds by DESMOND